Workato vs Cyclr vs Albato Embedded: Which to Choose?

In this article

For modern SaaS products, embedded integrations are essential. They allow users to connect your app with their favorite tools directly inside your interface—without touching APIs or writing code. This native experience drives faster onboarding, higher retention, and a more competitive product.

In this article, we will compare Workato Embedded, Cyclr, and Albato Embedded across features, UX, white-labeling, pricing, developer experience, and ease of embedding.

Quick Comparison Table

Overview of embedded iPaaS solutions for SaaS

Embedded iPaaS platforms let SaaS companies embed integration and automation capabilities inside their product. Instead of building dozens of connectors and maintaining them internally, your team offloads this responsibility to a dedicated platform.

UX/UI and developer experience

Let’s compare the three solutions based on their ease of use.

Workato: maximum power, high complexity

Workato is built for enterprise automation. Its web-based “recipe” editor supports advanced branching, data transformations, and formula logic.

Strengths:

• Handles very complex workflows.

• Strong data transformation and conditional logic.

• Large library of prebuilt recipes for reference.

Limitations:

• Steep learning curve.

• Automation design often requires experienced integration specialists.

• Non-technical users struggle without training.

• Visual editor can feel restrictive for developers implementing complex logic.

Best fit: Large organizations with dedicated automation or IT teams and complex internal processes.

Cyclr: controlled flexibility for SaaS products

Cyclr is designed for embedded integrations inside B2B SaaS products. Internal teams create workflows that are rolled out to all customers.

Strengths:

• Visual drag-and-drop builder.

• Good balance between usability and technical depth.

• Strong support for multi-tenant deployment (“build once, deploy to many”).

Limitations:

• Requires upfront setup and ongoing template management.

• Integrations are built by internal teams, not end users.

• Customization usually depends on product or engineering resources.

Best fit: SaaS teams that want full control over customer-facing integrations and have technical capacity to maintain them.

Albato Embedded: ease of use and speed

Albato focuses on simplicity and fast onboarding. The platform is fully no-code and accessible to non-technical users.

Strengths:

• Very low learning curve.

• Simple block-based builder.

• Prebuilt “Solutions” allow quick activation.

• Optional JavaScript steps for custom logic.

Limitations:

• Linear builder is less convenient for highly complex branching.

• Advanced logic is possible, but not the main focus.

Best fit: SaaS teams that need to launch integrations quickly, minimize engineering involvement, and support non-technical users.

White-labeling and embeddability

White-label integrations allow you to embed a third-party integration platform into your product ― without any third-party branding.

Workato

Workato offers two ways to embed integrations into your product.

Embedding options:

• Branded Access: a co-branded Workato interface with your logo and colors.
• Fully Embedded: a custom UI built by your team using Workato APIs.

Strengths:

• Flexible architecture.
• Suitable for teams that want full control through custom development.

Limitations:

• A fully native look requires significant engineering effort.
• Some Workato UI or structure may remain unless everything is custom-built.
• OAuth consent screens can show Workato unless custom OAuth apps are configured.

Overall: Powerful but not turnkey. Best for teams with strong engineering resources and time for custom UI work.

Cyclr

Cyclr was designed from the start for embedded, white-labeled integrations.

Strengths:

• Full control over branding, including domain and CSS.
• Uses your OAuth credentials, so consent screens show your app.
• White-labeled marketplace and setup wizard available by default.
• End users never see Cyclr accounts or UI.

Limitations:

• Requires setting up and managing integration templates.
• Less flexibility for rapid changes without technical involvement.

Overall: Native embedding with strong control, but better suited to teams ready to manage integrations long term.

Albato Embedded

Albato focuses on fast, fully native embedding with minimal development work.

Strengths:

• Fully white-labeled integration module.
• Easy embedding via iFrame or SDK.
• Complete branding control (colors, fonts, CSS).
• Runs under your domain for a seamless user experience.
• White-label OAuth ensures users only see your app.
• Token management and authentication handled automatically.

Limitations:

• Designed for speed and simplicity rather than deep UI customization.

Overall: Albato is an excellent choice for SaaS teams that want a truly native integration experience without building or maintaining complex infrastructure. It delivers clean white-labeling with the least engineering effort.

Integration features

A large library of connectors and the ease of adding new tools on-demand can be an important factor when choosing an integrations partner.

Connector Libraries

• Workato. ~1,200+ connectors, including many enterprise and on-prem systems.

• Cyclr. ~600+ connectors across CRM, ERP, marketing, support, finance, and more.

• Albato Embedded. 1000+ apps and rapidly growing, covering modern cloud apps and AI tools.

Workflow Complexity

• Workato. Most powerful. Handles deeply complex, multi-branch, and multi-system workflows.

• Cyclr. Strong low-code capabilities are appropriate for most SaaS use cases.

• Albato Embedded. Simple linear logic with optional JavaScript for advanced steps; best for standard SaaS workflows.

AI Features

• Workato and Albato highlight AI-driven automation features.

• Cyclr focuses more on integration infrastructure than AI.

Pricing

• Workato. Embedded and enterprise plans typically start in the mid five figures per year and can grow much higher as usage scales. Pricing is based on tasks, connectors, and execution volume, which can make costs harder to predict. It is best suited for mid-market and enterprise SaaS companies with large budgets and dedicated automation teams.
• Cyclr. Cyclr offers more transparent, mid-tier pricing. Plans commonly start at around $1,500–$2,000 per month, with costs increasing based on the number of connectors and API calls. Unlimited users and workflows are included, but usage limits apply. Cyclr works well for SaaS teams that want embedded integrations and can manage ongoing scaling costs.
• Albato Embedded. Albato Embedded has the lowest entry point of the three, starting at around $1,500 per month with high transaction limits. Only action executions count toward usage, while triggers and polls are free, which makes pricing more predictable. White-labeling and support are included on higher plans. Albato is a strong fit for teams that want embedded integrations without high upfront or usage-based costs.

Ideal use cases

Each platform can be a great partner, depending on your needs.

Workato Embedded

• Enterprise-level SaaS needing advanced automation and deep workflow logic.

• Platforms integrating with heavy systems (ERP, legacy databases).

• Companies with integration specialists or internal RevOps teams.

Cyclr

• Growing B2B SaaS needing a native integration marketplace.

• Teams wanting predictable pricing and strong multi-tenancy.

• SaaS needing white-label deployments that feel fully native.

Albato Embedded

• Startup and SMB SaaS teams needing quick time-to-market.

• Companies without dedicated integration engineers.

• Products requiring many modern SaaS connectors and easy activation.

• Teams prioritizing affordability and ease-of-use.

Summing up

Each platform solves a different problem:

• Choose Workato if you need enterprise-level workflow power, deep system integrations, and a robust automation engine—and you have the budget and technical team to support it.

• Choose Cyclr if you want a mature embedded integration framework with strong white-label capabilities and predictable pricing that grows with your SaaS.

• Choose Albato Embedded if you want to launch many native integrations quickly, with minimal engineering effort, full white-label UX, and the most affordable pricing.

For most growing SaaS products—especially those selling to SMB and mid-market customers—Albato Embedded offers the best combination of speed, simplicity, and cost-efficiency, while still providing a polished, native integration experience that increases product value.

• Merge Vs. Paragon Vs. Albato Embedded: Full Comparison
• How to Boost SaaS Retention by 30% With AI-Powered Email Marketing
• Paragon Vs. Prismatic Vs. Albato Embedded