In this article
Zapier is a popular platform for automating processes, syncing data, and creating integrations between applications without coding. However, it also has downsides: advanced workflows can be complex to set up, and pricing can become too high for tighter budgets.
If you're looking for Zapier alternatives, this article will help you quickly understand the essential differences between different iPaaS platforms and make the right choice.
Why seek alternatives to Zapier
Zapier has long been a go-to tool for workflow automation. While it’s definitely powerful, it’s not perfect:
High pricing at scale. Zapier’s costs increase significantly as usage grows. Power users or businesses managing multiple workflows can find it expensive.
Complexity for non-technical users. Some automations require a steep learning curve. Non-technical users may struggle with multi-step workflows, filters, and custom logic.
Limited flexibility in custom integrations. Zapier supports thousands of apps, but options are limited when a specific tool isn’t supported or a unique use case arises. Custom API integrations can be clunky or unavailable without advanced workarounds.
Slower update cycle for new tools. Integration of newer or niche apps can take time. Businesses using emerging SaaS tools may face delays before full compatibility is available.
These challenges open the door for better-suited Zapier alternatives, which address many of these pain points with a more accessible, flexible, and cost-effective approach.
Top Zapier Alternatives
Here are five Zapier competitors worth checking out.
Albato
Key strengths: Albato shines in customer support. Reading any reviews about the platform will convince you of this. If you don’t have a lot of experience with integrations or, on the contrary, require complex scenarios, individual approach can be a big plus.
Pricing: Albato provides an accessible and comfortable entry-level price, optimal for small and medium-sized businesses.
Overview: Zapier and Albato share a lot in common. Both are equipped with functional automation builders that are user-friendly and straightforward to use.
The principle of creating scenarios is based on triggers—events monitored in your application—and actions that are executed once these events are detected. You can also specify the data that needs to be passed along when implementing the scenario. Whether it involves two or numerous applications and actions within a single scenario, this similarity makes Albato perfect for experienced Zapier users looking for an alternative platform.
Source: g2.com
While Zapier positions itself as a solution for businesses of all sizes, from small companies and startups to large enterprises, users have noted that subscription prices are becoming less affordable for smaller companies and teams. Despite its robust features, Zapier pricing becomes a sensitive issue when choosing this platform, suggesting that it is primarily oriented towards mid-sized businesses or larger enterprises.
Source: g2.com
Albato offers flexibility to small and medium-sized businesses. Its level of customer service and support, data security, and stability also make it a viable option for large enterprises. Our philosophy is built on affordable pricing and ease of implementation, which ideally suits small teams, entrepreneurs, and startups.
Albato also offers a module for embedded integrations for SaaS. Read more in white-label feature comparison.
Key features of Albato:
-
800+ apps;
-
No-code workflows;
-
Ready-made templates to save time;
-
Conditions and filters for smarter automation;
-
Possibility to send and receive data via API or webhooks;
-
Schedule workflows or trigger them in real time.
Make
Key strengths: For marketers or freelancers who need quick setup and easy maintenance, Make may be too complex. However, for developers who need intricate workflows and custom logic, it offers unmatched control.
Pricing: It's often more affordable at higher usage levels than Zapier. Its operations-based model (vs. Zapier’s task-based billing) allows more actions within a single scenario without quickly exhausting limits.
Overview: Make is especially popular among tech-savvy professionals and teams who want more control than what typical no-code tools like Zapier offer.
At its core, Make allows users to connect apps and automate tasks through a modular, drag-and-drop interface. Scenarios are built on a flowchart-style canvas, where users define triggers and actions using a visual logic system. This gives Make an edge in terms of workflow flexibility and visual clarity—at least for users with some experience in automation or programming concepts.
Zapier vs Make: the second one is more flexible but less intuitive. Make allows branching, looping, conditional logic, and advanced data manipulation—all of which give users more control but also increase the learning curve.
Source: g2.com
Make offers, detailed documentation, and a growing community, but doesn’t yet match Zapier’s scale. Support response times can also vary, especially on lower-tier plans.
Another point to consider is app coverage. Zapier supports over 6,000 apps, including many niche tools. Make supports fewer—around 1,400+—but its flexibility with HTTP modules and webhooks allows users to connect to unsupported apps with custom API calls. This makes Make a good fit for users who are comfortable working with APIs or who need to create custom integrations beyond what’s available out of the box.
Key features of Make:
-
Visual scenario builder using drag-and-drop canvas;
-
Advanced logic support (conditional paths, iterations, data stores);
-
Built-in HTTP and webhook modules for custom integrations;
-
Real-time execution monitoring with detailed logs;
-
Support for over 1,400 apps;
-
Multi-step, multi-app workflows in a single scenario.
N8n
Key strengths: Customization and API control is where n8n stands out. Unlike Zapier, which limits users to predefined actions and app integrations, n8n allows full API-level interaction with any service. You can build custom functions, manage branching logic, loop through data sets, and chain together highly complex operations that would be difficult or impossible in Zapier.
Pricing: n8n, being open-source, offers self-hosted use for free. The cloud version is competitively priced but assumes more technical maintenance if self-hosted.
Overview: Zapier vs n8n are both automation platforms, but they’re built with very different users in mind. While Zapier caters to non-technical professionals looking for simple, quick automations, n8n is geared toward developers or technically-inclined users who need full control over their workflows. Understanding these differences is essential for choosing the right tool, especially for marketers, freelancers, sales teams, or small businesses.
Source: g2.com
Zapier enables users to connect apps and automate workflows through a clean, guided interface. Building a workflow—called a “Zap”—requires no technical expertise. Users select a trigger, define one or more actions, and Zapier handles the rest.
In contrast, n8n (short for "nodemation") is a low-code automation tool that provides a visual editor for building complex workflows. Still, it expects users to understand core logic structures and, in many cases, work directly with JSON, HTTP requests, or custom functions. While it’s still accessible compared to fully custom development, it’s a technical tool. For most non-technical users, n8n’s interface and configuration settings can feel intimidating or overly complex.
Key features of n8n:
- Low-code, technical learning curve;
- Full API control, custom scripting, advanced logic;
- Open-source Zapier alternative;
- Free for self-hosting, flexible cloud plans.
Zoho Flow
Key strengths: The key advantage of Zoho Flow lies in its tight integration with the broader Zoho suite—Zoho CRM, Zoho Books, Zoho Desk, Zoho Projects, and more. For users already embedded in the Zoho environment, Flow offers deeper app-level integration than Zapier.
Pricing: Zoho Flow offers competitive pricing with higher task limits than Zapier at similar tiers. It’s also included in some Zoho One and Zoho CRM Plus bundles, making it cost-effective for existing Zoho customers.
Overview: Zoho Flow is an automation tool within the Zoho ecosystem that helps users connect different apps and automate tasks across cloud-based software. Like Zapier, it enables workflows based on triggers and actions, allowing teams to eliminate repetitive manual tasks. But while Zapier is a general-purpose automation platform designed for a wide audience, Zoho Flow is much more focused—it’s built primarily for users already using Zoho products.
It allows granular control of Zoho app actions, including detailed field mapping and record updates that aren't always possible with third-party tools.
For non-Zoho apps, however, Zoho Flow’s ecosystem is relatively limited. It currently supports around 900+ apps, with most integrations focused on widely-used tools like Slack, Gmail, Google Sheets, and Trello. This is significantly fewer than Zapier’s 6,000+ integrations.
Support and documentation are aligned with other Zoho products: responsive email support, solid documentation, and regular product updates. However, community forums and third-party resources are more limited compared to Zapier.
Key features of Zoho Flow:
- Deep integration with Zoho apps;
- Visual flow builder with trigger-action logic;
- Supports 900+ cloud apps;
- Multi-step workflows and conditional branching;
- Built-in scripting support via Zoho Deluge;
- Affordable pricing with generous task limits;
- Basic webhook and API support.
Comparison Table
| Platform | Ease of Use | App Integrations | Customization | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zapier | Very easy (no-code) | 6,000+ | Limited to built-in functions | Widest app coverage |
| Albato | Very easy (no-code) | 800+ | High | Balance of ease & flexibility |
| Make | Moderate (visual, some learning) | 1,400+ | High (logic, iterators, API options) | Complex workflows |
| n8n | Low-code (technical users) | API-based/custom | Very high (custom code, full control) | Open-source, developer teams |
| Zoho Flow | Moderate (best for Zoho users) | 900+ | High within Zoho suite | Zoho-centric workflows |
FAQ
What’s the best alternative to Zapier for non-technical users?
Albato is great option for non-technical users and teams. It offers a simple, intuitive setup process with minimal learning curve—ideal for marketers, sales managers, and freelancers.
What’s the best option for complex workflows?
Make is a strong choice for building advanced, multi-step workflows with logic, branching, and loops. It’s best for users with some technical experience.
Is there an open-source alternative to Zapier?
Yes. n8n is a low-code, open-source automation tool. You can self-host it for free and build highly customizable workflows—ideal for developers or companies with in-house tech support.
How does Albato compare to Zapier in ease of use?
Albato offers a simpler, more straightforward interface, especially for beginners. It’s less cluttered than Zapier and requires no prior automation experience.
Which platform supports the most apps?
Zapier has the largest library, with over 6,000 app integrations. If you rely on niche or less-common tools, it's worth checking Zapier’s app directory first.
Can I migrate my Zapier workflows to another platform easily?
Most platforms, including Albato, allow you to recreate workflows manually. There’s no automatic migration, but Albato’s support can help you move your workflows.
Albato: The best Zapier alternative
Albato offers a comparable set of features to Zapier:
- Provides all the necessary tools and features to solve 99% of your tasks;
- Keeps the UI simple, so you can accomplish tasks quickly and move on to more important matters related to your businessl
- Offers expert and extremely prompt live technical support, ensuring you don't waste precious time on issues related to integrations and automation settings.
This is especially important for business settings, as Albato becomes an excellent, more cost-effective Zapier alternative for small businesses, startups, and medium-sized companies.
Read more:
